Haan, N. L., G. N. Benucci, C. M. Fiser, G. Bonito, and D. A. Landis. 2023. Contrasting effects of bioenergy crops on biodiversity. Science Advances 9:eadh7960.

Citable PDF link: https://lter.kbs.msu.edu/pub/4138

Agriculture is driving biodiversity loss, and future bioenergy cropping systems have the potential to ameliorate or exacerbate these effects. Using a long-term experimental array of 10 bioenergy cropping systems, we quantified diversity of plants, invertebrates, vertebrates, and microbes in each crop. For many taxonomic groups, alternative annual cropping systems provided no biodiversity benefits when compared to corn (the business-as-usual bioenergy crop in the United States), and simple perennial grass?based systems provided only modest gains. In contrast, for most animal groups, richness in plant-diverse perennial systems was much higher than in annual crops or simple perennial systems. Microbial richness patterns were more eclectic, although some groups responded positively to plant diversity. Future agricultural landscapes incorporating plant-diverse perennial bioenergy cropping systems could be of high conservation value. However, increased use of annual crops will continue to have negative effects, and simple perennial grass systems may provide little improvement over annual crops. Ten bioenergy crops that could dominate future landscapes support vastly different amounts of biodiversity.

DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adh7960

Data URL: 10.5281/zenodo.8215581

Associated Treatment Areas:

  • G5 Switchgrass
  • G4 Switchgrass
  • G6 Miscanthus
  • G7 Native Grasses
  • G8 Hybrid Poplar
  • G9 Early Successional
  • G10 Restored Prairie
  • G1 Continuous Corn
  • G3 Sorghum + cover crops
  • G2 Continuous Sorghum

Download citation to endnote bibtex

Get PDF back to index
Sign In